So I was listening to a program about words that is on late at night on Sunday on National Public Radio. I love it, but it is on late and you really can't have that show as background noise...you have to listen.
They explained the phrase "O.K.'.
I was telling Bern about the explanation and told her, "you know how people say 'naught' to mean nothing?"
She told me I was the only person she knew who ever said "naught' to mean 'nothing'. I was rather proud of that--being unique and all. I do say 'naught' and will say it more often now.
Any how, back in the 18th century spoken English had an antonym to 'naught' (meaning nothing) that was 'aught' (meaning 'everything'). And a saying came into being to indicated 'everything is alright'. It was "aught correct". However (and here's the rub) spelling wasn't regularized at the time and legitimate and acceptable spellings of 'aught' and 'correct' were 'ought' and 'korrect'.
Get it? "Ought Korrect" become OK.
This is just a corrective (korrective?) to the spelling police. If there hadn't been some give and take about spelling the saying we would have to indicate that all was placid and fine would be "AC", which would cause no end of problems since people would be thinking you were talking about electrical current or air conditioning instead of everything being OK.
OK? or, if you prefer, AC?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(204)
-
▼
August
(14)
- Into the eye of the storm
- more than you want to know...really....
- Rainmaker
- That old unfamiliar feeling
- on the road
- The Archangel Mariah
- big world/small church
- Crickets (2)
- crickets (2)
- crickets
- passing along information--OK?
- the hysterical district
- next time call me before you do the study....
- sometimes the dog eats the couch....
-
▼
August
(14)
About Me
- Under The Castor Oil Tree
- some ponderings by an aging white man who is an Episcopal priest in Connecticut. Now retired but still working and still wondering what it all means...all of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment